Reader Response on Cladding Draft 3
In the article “Use of Cladding in Buildings Here Have
Grown in Recent Times”, Mokhtar (2017) reported the increasing use of cladding
in Singapore and its benefits and risks. He defines cladding as a layer of
panels added to the exterior facade of buildings to cut energy use, improve
building appearance and provide shade. However, he points out that the use of
cladding came under the intense scrutiny after the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy, where
the fire had spread upwards rapidly due to the ventilation gaps between the
cladding and the building’s wall, drawing oxygenated air from the bottom of the
facade and fueling the fire. Mokhtar iterates that the use of cladding in
Singapore is regulated, where the cladding material must not allow fire to
spread along its surface when ignited.
While it is undeniable that the use of cladding has
many advantages, it is crucial to review the materials used in its design,
where the material property, combustibility, is critical in improving fire
safety of buildings.
Firstly, combustibility of the material must be the
primary consideration when selecting materials for use in claddings. The
Singapore Civil Defence Force has specified in the Singapore Fire Code that “if
such cladding is situated less than 1 m from any point on the relevant
boundary, it shall have surface complying with the requirements for Class '0'”.
Class ‘0’ is a requirement where “the material of which the wall or ceiling is
constructed shall be non-combustible throughout”. In contrast, the UK authorities
left the responsibility of fire safety in buildings to their respective owners (Morby, 2017).
As a result, some companies chose to use cheaper but more combustible materials
as cladding. This is unacceptable as little consideration is given to fire
safety.
Secondly, to expound further on the material property,
attention is given to combustible materials. In the case of the Grenfell Tower
incident, the cladding material used was mostly polyethylene (PE), a plastic
material with a low melting point between 120°C and 180°C. It would
easily fail when a blaze occurs. This is certainly not the best materials to
use, considering the combustibility of PE. In another incident as reported by
Channel NewsAsia on 4th May 2017, a building at 30 Toh Guan Road had
used the same PE material in its cladding, which caught fire and propagated
fire spread upwards along the cladding (Channel NewsAsia, 2017). Although PE is
cost-efficient and lightweight, it counteracts fire control measures, thus
making it an unsuitable material to increase fire safety.
On the other hand, fire-retardant
(FR) materials are widely available. One example is the fire-retardant aluminium
composite material, or FR-ACM. It consists of aluminium, PE and aluminium
tri-hydroxide, a mineral filler that is incombustible. This
incombustible mineral filler changes the properties of the cladding material
entirely, giving the cladding FR properties. Only this type of aluminium-PE
cladding with incombustible mineral filler has passed the Building Regulations
tests in the UK (Morby, 2017). According to the video “Comparing the
Flammability of Different Cladding” (Sturmer, 2017), the PE cladding within
aluminium plates caught fire within 5 seconds of exposure to a blow torch flame.
However, the FR cladding, made of ACM and FR material, did not sustain a fire even
at 20 seconds, thus emphasizing the need for cladding materials to have FR
materials incorporated in them.
Since the Singapore Fire Code has specified that
cladding materials are required to have class ‘0’ standard, this ought to be
emphasized globally that the materials used in cladding need to be
incombustible. Cost-efficiency is important. However, fire safety must not be
compromised. The material used must contain FR materials that would increase
the fire safety of buildings, be it in Singapore or other countries. Therefore,
in a bid to increase fire safety of buildings, strong emphasis on material
property, specifically combustibility, is needed when choosing the type of material
to be used in claddings.
References
Bergin. (2017, June 24). Arconic knowingly supplied flammable panels for use in tower – emails. Reuters. Retrieved from https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-fire-arconic/arconic-knowingly-supplied-flammable-panels-for-use-in-tower-emails-idUKKBN19F05C
Booth. (2017, July 6). Grenfell Tower: fire-proof cladding specified by architects used only on ground floor. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/06/grenfell-fire-proof-cladding-specified-by-architects-only-used-on-ground-floor
Davies, Connolly, Sample. (2017, June 16). Cladding for Grenfell Tower was cheaper, more flammable option. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/16/manufacturer-of-cladding-on-grenfell-tower-identified-as-omnis-exteriors
Loh, C.J. (2017, August 24). 36 buildings may have combustible cladding that doesn't meet safety standards; police investigating. Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/36-buildings-may-have-combustible-cladding-that-doesn-t-meet-9153588
Mitsubishi Plastics. (2008). Material safety data sheet - ALPOLIC®/fr, Aluminum Composite Material with fire-retardant core filled with non-combustible mineral. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from http://www.alpolic.com/alpolic-intl/downloads/msds_alpolicfr.pdf
Mokhtar. (2017, June 17). Use of cladding in buildings here have grown in recent times: Experts. Today Online. Retrieved from: http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/use-cladding-buildings-here-have-grown-recent-times-experts
Morby. (2017, August 13). First ACM cladding passes fire tests. Construction Enquirer. Retrieved from http://www.constructionenquirer.com/2017/08/13/first-acm-cladding-passes-fire-tests/
Schreck, Gambrell. (2016, January 19). How a common building material turned a Dubai hotel fire into an inferno. The Associated Press. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com/business/2016/01/19/how-a-common-building-material-turned-a-dubai-hotel-fire-into-an-inferno.html
Singapore Civil Defence Force. (2015). Singapore Fire Safety Engineering Guidelines 2015. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from https://www.scdf.gov.sg/sites/www.scdf.gov.sg/files/Singapore%20Fire%20Safety%20Engineering%20Guidelines%202015_1.pdf
Singapore Civil Defence Force. (2015). Singapore Fire Safety Engineering Guidelines 2015. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from https://www.scdf.gov.sg/sites/www.scdf.gov.sg/files/Singapore%20Fire%20Safety%20Engineering%20Guidelines%202015_1.pdf
Sturmer. (2017, July 28). Comparing the flammability of different cladding. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-28/comparing-the-flammability-of-cladding/8752786
Walker. (2017, July 28). Building
regulations to be reviewed after safety tests following Grenfell. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/28/government-announces-independent-review-building-regulations-grenfell-tower-fire
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edited on:
1 Nov 2017, 11.00am
1 Nov 2017, 12.24pm
3 Nov 2017, 5.27pm
18 Nov 2017, 1.59am
23 Nov 2017, 11.52pm
Comments
Post a Comment