Reader Response on Cladding Draft 2

Readers Response
In the article, “Use of Cladding in Buildings Here Have Grown in Recent Times” (Mokhtar, 2017), reported the increasing use of cladding in Singapore and its benefits and risks. Cladding is a layer of panels added to the exterior facade of buildings to cut energy use, improve building appearance or provide shade. The use of cladding, however, came under the limelight after the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy. The fire had spread upwards rapidly due to the ventilation gaps between the cladding and the building’s wall, drawing oxygenated air from the bottom of the facade and fueling the fire. In Singapore, the use of cladding is regulated. For example, cladding material must not allow fire to spread along its surface when ignited. Besides meeting statutory regulations, a building owner was cited to have included measures to prevent fire from spreading between levels and regular certification of fire protection systems. While it is undeniable that the use of cladding has many advantages, it is extremely crucial to review the materials used in its design, which is critical in improving fire safety of buildings.

Firstly, combustibility of the material must be the primary consideration when selecting materials for use in claddings. The Singapore Civil Defence Force has specified in the Singapore Fire Code that “if such cladding is situated less than 1 m from any point on the relevant boundary, it shall have surface complying with the requirements for Class '0'”. Class ‘0’ is a requirement where “the material of which the wall or ceiling is constructed shall be non-combustible throughout”. In contrast, the UK authorities left the responsibility of fire safety in buildings to their respective owners. As a result, some companies chose to use cheaper but more combustible materials as cladding. This is unacceptable as little consideration is given to fire safety.

Secondly, to expound further on the material property, attention is given to combustible materials. In the case of the Grenfell Tower incident, the cladding material used was mostly polyethylene (PE), a plastic material that has low melting point that is between 120°C and 180°C. It would easily fail when a blaze occurs. This is certainly not the best materials to use, considering the combustibility of PE. In another incident as reported by Channel NewsAsia on 4th May 2017, the building at 30 Toh Guan Road had used the same PE material in its cladding, which caught fire and propagated fire spread upwards along the cladding (Channel NewsAsia, 2017). Although PE is cost-efficient and lightweight, it counteracts fire control measures, thus making it an unsuitable material to increase fire safety.

On the other hand, there is the existence of fire-retardant (FR) materials, which are widely available. One example is the fire-retardant aluminium composite material, or FR-ACM. It consists of aluminium, PE and aluminium tri-hydroxide­, a mineral filler that is incombustible. This incombustible mineral filler changes the properties of the cladding material entirely, giving the cladding FR properties. Only this type of aluminium-PE cladding with incombustible mineral filler has passed the Building Regulations tests in the UK (Morby, 2017). According to the video “Comparing the Flammability of Different Cladding” (Sturmer, 2017), the PE cladding within aluminium plates caught fire within 5 seconds of exposure to a blow torch flame. However, the FR cladding, made of ACM and FR material, did not sustain a fire even at 20 seconds, thus emphasizing the need for cladding materials to have FR materials incorporated in them.

Since the Singapore Fire Code has specified that cladding materials are required to have class ‘0’ standard, this ought to be emphasized globally that the materials used in cladding need to be incombustible. Cost-efficiency is important. However, fire safety must not be compromised. The material used must contain FR materials that would increase the fire safety of buildings, be it in Singapore or other countries. Therefore, strong emphasis on material property, specifically in relation to fire safety, is needed when choosing the type of material to be used in claddings.



References
36 buildings may have combustible cladding that doesn't meet safety standards; police investigating. (2017). Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/36-buildings-may-have-combustible-cladding-that-doesn-t-meet-9153588

Arconic knowingly supplied flammable panels for use in tower – emails. (2017). Reuters. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-fire-arconic/arconic-knowingly-supplied-flammable-panels-for-use-in-tower-emails-idUKKBN19F05C

Building regulations to be reviewed after safety tests following Grenfell. (2017). The Guardian. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/28/government-announces-independent-review-building-regulations-grenfell-tower-fire

Cladding for Grenfell Tower was cheaper, more flammable option. (2017). The Guardian. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/16/manufacturer-of-cladding-on-grenfell-tower-identified-as-omnis-exteriors

Comparing the flammability of different cladding. (2017). Jake Sturmer. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-28/comparing-the-flammability-of-cladding/8752786

First ACM cladding passes fire tests. (2017). Construction Enquirer. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from http://www.constructionenquirer.com/2017/08/13/first-acm-cladding-passes-fire-tests/

Grenfell Tower: fire-proof cladding specified by architects used only on ground floor. (2017). The Guardian. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/06/grenfell-fire-proof-cladding-specified-by-architects-only-used-on-ground-floor

How a common building material turned a Dubai hotel fire into an inferno. (2017). The Star. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from https://www.thestar.com/business/2016/01/19/how-a-common-building-material-turned-a-dubai-hotel-fire-into-an-inferno.html

Mitsubishi Plastics. (2008). Material safety data sheet - ALPOLIC®/fr, Aluminum Composite Material with fire-retardant core filled with non-combustible mineral. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from http://www.alpolic.com/alpolic-intl/downloads/msds_alpolicfr.pdf

Singapore Civil Defence Force. (2015). Singapore Fire Safety Engineering Guidelines 2015. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from https://www.scdf.gov.sg/sites/www.scdf.gov.sg/files/Singapore%20Fire%20Safety%20Engineering%20Guidelines%202015_1.pdf

Woman suffers burns after fire breaks out at warehouse opposite IMM. (2017). Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved, September 25, 2017, from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/woman-suffers-burns-after-fire-breaks-out-at-warehouse-opposite-8816664

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Critical Reflection on SIE 2016 Effective Communications

At the start of the course, I have made a commitment to seek new ways to improve my writing and oral presentation skills. If there was one thing to take away from this module, it is to write and re-write an essay a thousand times. Although having a strong command in English is important, an essay written once may not always be perfect. There will always be areas to be improve on. The key point is ' improvement '. There must be an improvement in the second, third, fourth, fifth, and up to the thousandth draft. There is no point of re-doing an essay if the same mistakes were repeated again and again. One article that I have re-written many times is the reader response on cladding. That article was one that I had spent most time (and probably brain cells too) on, and I am glad to have attained one of the highest grades for that assignment so far. From that reader response, I have learnt the lesson of re-writing an essay a thousand times. As I have said, there will always be area...
Read more

Re-written Segment of Formal Report - Executive Summary

Re-written Version Executive Summary With reference to the transmittal letter, this report asserts the need for an automated lighting control system in classrooms, which will promote energy conservation and reduction of utilities bills in Singapore Institute of Technology at Dover (SIT@Dover). Currently, lights in classrooms are left turned on after classes and after office hours, resulting in electricity and manpower wastages, and unnecessary financial expenses. This report also serves to discuss and assess the potential solutions that team Conservo has brainstormed on. The proposed solution suggests installing a Passive Infrared (PIR) motion sensor, coupled with a timer device, in classrooms. The benefits and evaluations of the proposed solution are also expounded. Additionally, ways to overcome the limitations of the proposed solution are presented. The report concludes that PIR sensors, installed in classrooms, will allow SIT@Dover to achieve electricity and cost savings, en...
Read more

Analytical Reflection on Oral Presentation

On the 16 th of November 2017, I did a presentation with my team to ‘sell’ our solution to solving SIT’s electricity wastage woes. Honestly, I do not think that I have done well for it. I was spontaneous with my words, and had the tendency to go off-topic or beat around the bush. With only 3 key points on my slide and elaborations in my head, I brought the audience a full circle around the same point during the evaluations section. Moreover, everyone could see that I was nervous, as seen by a laser pointer that shakes uncontrollably each time I point at the screen. Surely, my presentation could have been better. I could hold a script in my hand, but, to me, that’s very amateur. I would rather speak on the spot and be free to move. The best way to deliver a presentation is to be familiar with the content - to be one with the project. This way, the presentation would be more genuine. According to what I have written in my first blogpost in this communications class, I mentioned...
Read more